New Orleans DWI Defense Attorney New Orleans Criminal Defense Attorney - Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. Criminal Defense Practice Areas Personal Injury Practice Areas Cyber Crimes Defense New Orleans Contact Your Criminal Defense Attorney in New Orleans New Orleans Attorney Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Criminal Defense New Orleans’

Cheating and Swindling — Louisiana

New Orleans White Collar Crime Defense Attorney

 

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. — White Collar Crime New Orleans

 

 Cheating and Swindling — La RS 14:67.18

A.  It shall be unlawful for any person who by any trick or sleight of hand performance, or by fraud or fraudulent scheme, cards, dice, or device, for himself or another, wins or attempts to win money or property or a combination thereof, or reduces a losing wager or attempts to reduce a losing wager, increases a winning wager or attempts to increase a winning wager in connection with gaming operations.

B.(1)  Whoever violates the provisions of this Section when the value of such money or property or combination thereof or reduced or increased wager amounts to a value of one thousand five hundred dollars or more shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than ten years, or may be fined not more than three thousand dollars, or both.

(2)  When the value of such money or property or combination thereof or reduced or increased wager amounts to a value of five hundred dollars or more, but less than a value of one thousand five hundred dollars, the offender shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than five years, or may be fined not more than two thousand dollars, or both.

(3)  When the value of such money or property or combination thereof or reduced or increased wager amounts to less than a value of five hundred dollars, the offender shall be imprisoned for not more than six months, or may be fined not more than five hundred dollars, or both. If the offender in such cases has been convicted of cheating and swindling two or more times previously, upon any subsequent conviction he shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than two years, or may be fined not more than two thousand dollars, or both.

 

Facing an indictment for a white collar crime is one of the most difficult experiences one could possibly endure. In addition to whatever consequences a conviction might bring, including prison time and permanent felony conviction on your record, a white collar crime charge can do lasting damage to your reputation and tear apart your family, even if you are not convicted. Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Law understands the stress that you are experiencing. Our job is to minimize any potential damage to your future and protect your rights.

Theft of Motor Vehicle Fuel — Louisiana

 

New Orleans Criminal Theft Defense Attorney

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. —  Criminal Attorney New Orleans 

 

If you have been charged with Theft — you need a good lawyer on your side to fight for your rights!

 

Theft of Motor Vehicle Fuel — La RS 14:67.17

No person shall dispense fuel, including gasoline and diesel, into the fuel tank of a motor vehicle at an establishment in which motor gasoline or diesel is offered for retail sale and leave the premises of the establishment unless the payment or authorized charge for the fuel has been made.

Whoever violates the provisions of this Section shall be subject to a fine or imprisonment or both, in accordance with the penalties prescribed in R.S. 14:67.

In addition, the driver’s license of any person violating the provisions of this Section shall be suspended upon conviction or plea of guilty or nolo contendere.  Upon a first conviction, the driver’s license suspension shall be for a period not to exceed 6 months.  Upon a second or subsequent conviction, the suspension shall be for a period not to exceed one year.  Upon conviction or plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the court shall surrender the driver’s license to the Department of Public Safety and Corrections for suspension in accordance with the provisions of this Section.

 

Contact Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. to schedule a Consultation today!

Fraudulent Portrayal of a Law Enforcement Officer or Firefighter — Louisiana

New Orleans Criminal Defense Attorney

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. — New Orleans Premiere Criminal Defense Attorney


Serving Clients in Orleans Parish, St. Tammany Parish, St. John Parish, St. James Parish, St. Bernard Parish, St. Charles Parish, Assumption Parish, Tangipahoa Parish, Terrebonne Parish, Plaquemines Parish and Jefferson Parish.

 

Fraudulent Portrayal of a Law Enforcement Officer or Firefighter — 14:112.2

Fraudulent portrayal of a law enforcement officer or firefighter is the impersonation of any law enforcement officer or firefighter for the purpose of obtaining access to a public building, facility, or service.  The fraudulent portrayal includes but is not limited to any of the following:

(1)  Portraying or impersonating a law enforcement officer or firefighter by any means.

(2)  Possessing, without authority, any uniform or badge by which a law enforcement officer or firefighter is identified.

(3)  Performing any act purporting to be official while portraying a law enforcement officer or firefighter.

(4)  Making, altering, possessing, or using a false document or document containing false statements which purports to be a training program certificate or in-service training certificate or other documentation issued by the Council on Peace Officer Standards and Training, pursuant to R.S. 40:2405, which certifies the peace officer has successfully completed the requirements necessary to exercise his authority as a peace officer.

(5)  Making, altering, possessing, or using any false documents or credentials which purport to identify the person as a law enforcement officer or firefighter.

For the purposes of this Section, “law enforcement officer or firefighter” shall include police officers, sheriffs, deputy sheriffs, marshals, deputy marshals, correctional officers, constables, wildlife enforcement agents, state park wardens, firemen, and probation and parole officers.

 ”Access to a public building, facility, or service” includes but is not limited to the following:

(1)  Free and unhampered passage on and over toll bridges and ferries in this state.

(2)  Free passage on and over the Crescent City Connection Bridge at New Orleans.

(3)  Free passage on any tollway as defined in R.S. 48:2021(17).

(4)  Free parking at any parking facility owned by the state or any of its political subdivisions.

(5)  Free admission or reduced price admission to any entertainment, cultural, or sporting event.

Whoever commits the crime of fraudulent portrayal of a law enforcement officer or firefighter shall be fined not more than $1,000.00 dollars or imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than 2 years, or both.

False Impersonation of a Police Officer or Firefighter — Louisiana

New Orleans Criminal Defense Attorney

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. — New Orleans Premiere Criminal Defense Attorney


Serving Clients in Orleans Parish, St. Tammany Parish, St. John Parish, St. James Parish, St. Bernard Parish, St. Charles Parish, Assumption Parish, Tangipahoa Parish, Terrebonne Parish, Plaquemines Parish and Jefferson Parish.

 

False Personation of a Police Officer or Firefighter– La RS 14:112.1

False personation of a peace officer is the performance of any one or more of the following acts with the intent to injure or defraud or to obtain or secure any special privilege or advantage:

(1)  Impersonating any peace officer or assuming, without authority, any uniform or badge by which a peace officer or firefighter is lawfully distinguished.

(2)  Performing any act purporting to be official in such assumed character.

(3)  Making, altering, possession, or use of a false document or document containing false statements which purports to be a training program certificate or in-service training certificate or other documentation issued by the Council on Peace Officer Standards and Training, pursuant to R.S. 40:2405, which certifies the peace officer has successfully completed the requirements necessary to exercise his authority as a peace officer.

(4)  Equipping any motor vehicle with lights or sirens which simulate a law enforcement vehicle.

Whoever commits the crime of false personation of a peace officer or firefighter shall be fined not more than $1,000 dollars or imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than 2 years, or both

False Impersonation Law — Louisiana

New Orleans Criminal Defense Attorney

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. — New Orleans Premiere Criminal Defense Attorney


Serving Clients in Orleans Parish, St. Tammany Parish, St. John Parish, St. James Parish, St. Bernard Parish, St. Charles Parish, Assumption Parish, Tangipahoa Parish, Terrebonne Parish, Plaquemines Parish and Jefferson Parish.

 

 

False Impersonation — 14:1112

False personation is the performance of any of the following acts with the intent to injure or defraud, or to obtain or secure any special privilege or advantage:

(1)  Impersonating any public officer, or private individual having special authority by law to perform an act affecting the rights or interests of another, or the assuming, without authority, of any uniform or badge by which such officer or person is lawfully distinguished; or

(2)  Performing any act purporting to be official in such assumed character.

Whoever commits the crime of false personation shall be fined not more than $100.00 dollars, or imprisoned for not more than 90 days, or both.

Court Holds Viewing Child Pornography Does Not Necessarily Indicate Possession

Sex Crimes Defense Attorney Louisiana

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. — New Orleans Criminal Defense

 

If you are facing a Sex Crime charge in Louisiana of Possession, Production, Distribution of Pornography Involving Juveniles, it is imperative that you seek counsel from an experienced Sex Crime Defense Attorney in Louisiana.  American culture has created a witch hunt atmosphere for those accused of a sex crime; you will have to face hostile prosecutors and harsh public opinion.  Elizabeth B. Carpenter Law is here to defend you and to protect your freedom.  Ms. Carpenter has the experience necessary to effectuate skilled representation for those accused of Possession, Production, Distribution of Child Pornography.  Contact us to schedule a consultation.

 

Court Holds Viewing Child Pornography

Does Not Necessarily Indicate Possession

 

The Court of Appeals, New York ruled on Tuesday that viewing child pornography on the Internet without any follow-up action like saving or printing files does not create an automatic conclusion of possession of pornographic materials. The ruling was made in the course of considering the case against James Kent, a former professor at Marist College who was convicted in 2009 for 143 counts of possession of child pornography. Two vital counts of that ‘possession’ were dismissed by the court of appeals raising questions as to the fate of the rest.

 

The question that was considered was whether copies of a web page automatically stored in the computer’s temporary cache while browsing the internet can be construed as ‘possession.’ The court held that to ‘possess’ the cached images, “the defendant’s conduct must exceed mere viewing to encompass more affirmative acts of control such as printing, downloading or saving.”

 

Judge Carmen Ciparick wrote for the court that the prosecutors need to prove, “at a minimum, that the defendant was aware of the presence of those items in the cache.”

 

When in 2007, Kent asked information technology staff to have a look at his computer, an employee found numerous photos and videos of young children in compromising positions. Almost 30,000 files were found in the computer’s cache. Kent had argued that he had used the images as part of his research in child pornography and that it could not be possession as he was mostly unaware that such files were saved in his computer’s cache.

 

Kent was convicted by a non-jury trial of 143 counts of possession. On Appeal, in 2010, the Second Department Appellate Division upheld the conviction and ruled that a cached web page “is evidence that the web page was accessed and displayed on the defendant’s computer screen.”

 

On Tuesday, the Court of Appeals dismissed two counts which related to files that had not been saved on purpose.

 

The appellate court mentioned, “a defendant cannot knowingly acquire or possess that which he or she does not know exists.”

 

However, Judge Victoria Graffeo wrote that the opinion was so broad as to legalize viewing child pornography in New York. Though she concurred in the appellate court’s decision, she said that the opinion goes against the intent of the legislature to punish consumers and eradicate the market for child pornography.

 

Graffeo wrote “The majority’s decision … will, unfortunately, lead to increased consumption of child pornography by luring new viewers who were previously dissuaded by the potential for criminal prosecution.” Judge Eugene Pigott, too, joined Graffeo and wrote that it is a crime to consciously access child pornography.

 

The case has been sent back for resentencing.

 

The case is the People v. James Kent, New York State Court of Appeals No. 70.

Louisiana Is The World’s Prison Capital — Part 1 of 7 Part Series

Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. – Serving clients in Orleans, Jefferson, Terrebonne, Tangipahoa, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. Tammany, St. John, Assumption and Plaquemines Parishes.

 

Louisiana Is The World’s Prison Capital

 

PART 2

PART 3

PART 4

PART 5

PART 6

PART 7

By Cindy Chang, The Times-Picayune

Louisiana is the world’s prison capital. The state imprisons more of its people, per head, than any of its U.S. counterparts. First among Americans means first in the world. Louisiana’s incarceration rate is nearly triple Iran’s, seven times China’s and 10 times Germany’s.

The hidden engine behind the state’s well-oiled prison machine is cold, hard cash. A majority of Louisiana inmates are housed in for-profit facilities, which must be supplied with a constant influx of human beings or a $182 million industry will go bankrupt.

 

Several homegrown private prison companies command a slice of the market. But in a uniquely Louisiana twist, most prison entrepreneurs are rural sheriffs, who hold tremendous sway in remote parishes like Madison, Avoyelles, East Carroll and Concordia. A good portion of Louisiana law enforcement is financed with dollars legally skimmed off the top of prison operations.

If the inmate count dips, sheriffs bleed money. Their constituents lose jobs. The prison lobby ensures this does not happen by thwarting nearly every reform that could result in fewer people behind bars.

Meanwhile, inmates subsist in bare-bones conditions with few programs to give them a better shot at becoming productive citizens. Each inmate is worth $24.39 a day in state money, and sheriffs trade them like horses, unloading a few extras on a colleague who has openings. A prison system that leased its convicts as plantation labor in the 1800s has come full circle and is again a nexus for profit.

In the past two decades, Louisiana’s prison population has doubled, costing taxpayers billions while New Orleans continues to lead the nation in homicides.

One in 86 adult Louisianians is doing time, nearly double the national average. Among black men from New Orleans, one in 14 is behind bars; one in seven is either in prison, on parole or on probation. Crime rates in Louisiana are relatively high, but that does not begin to explain the state’s No. 1 ranking, year after year, in the percentage of residents it locks up.

In Louisiana, a two-time car burglar can get 24 years without parole. A trio of drug convictions can be enough to land you at the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola for the rest of your life.

Almost every state lets judges decide when to mete out the severest punishment and when a sympathetic defendant should have a chance at freedom down the road. In Louisiana, murderers automatically receive life without parole on the guilty votes of as few as 10 of 12 jurors.

The lobbying muscle of the sheriffs, buttressed by a tough-on-crime electorate, keeps these harsh sentencing schemes firmly in place.

“Something has to be done — it just has to be done — about the long sentences,” said Angola Warden Burl Cain. “Some people you can let out of here that won’t hurt you and can be productive citizens, and we know the ones who can’t.”

Every dollar spent on prisons is a dollar not spent on schools, hospitals and highways. Other states are strategically reducing their prison populations — using tactics known in policy circles as “smart on crime.” Compared with the national average, Louisiana has a much lower percentage of people incarcerated for violent offenses and a much higher percentage behind bars for drug offenses — perhaps a signal that some nonviolent criminals could be dealt with differently.

Do all of Louisiana’s 40,000 inmates need to be incarcerated for the interests of punishment and public safety to be served? Gov. Bobby Jindal, a conservative Republican with presidential ambitions, says the answer is no. Despite locking up more people for longer periods than any other state, Louisiana has one of the highest rates of both violent and property crimes. Yet the state shows no signs of weaning itself off its prison dependence.

“You have people who are so invested in maintaining the present system — not just the sheriffs, but judges, prosecutors, other people who have links to it,” said Burk Foster, a former professor at the University of Louisiana-Lafayette and an expert on Louisiana prisons. “They don’t want to see the prison system get smaller or the number of people in custody reduced, even though the crime rate is down, because the good old boys are all linked together in the punishment network, which is good for them financially and politically.”

 

Keeping The Beds Full

In the early 1990s, when the incarceration rate was half what it is now, Louisiana was at a crossroads. Under a federal court order to reduce overcrowding, the state had two choices: Lock up fewer people or build more prisons.

It achieved the latter, not with new state prisons — there was no money for that — but by encouraging sheriffs to foot the construction bills in return for future profits. The financial incentives were so sweet, and the corrections jobs so sought after, that new prisons sprouted up all over rural Louisiana.

The national prison population was expanding at a rapid clip. Louisiana’s grew even faster. There was no need to rein in the growth by keeping sentencing laws in line with those of other states or by putting minor offenders in alternative programs. The new sheriffs’ beds were ready and waiting. Overcrowding became a thing of the past, even as the inmate population multiplied rapidly.

“If the sheriffs hadn’t built those extra spaces, we’d either have to go to the Legislature and say, ‘Give us more money,’ or we’d have to reduce the sentences, make it easier to get parole and commutation — and get rid of people who shouldn’t be here,” said Richard Crane, former general counsel for the Louisiana Department of Corrections.

Today, wardens make daily rounds of calls to other sheriffs’ prisons in search of convicts to fill their beds. Urban areas such as New Orleans and Baton Rouge have an excess of sentenced criminals, while prisons in remote parishes must import inmates to survive.

The more empty beds, the more an operation sinks into the red. With maximum occupancy and a thrifty touch with expenses, a sheriff can divert the profits to his law enforcement arm, outfitting his deputies with new squad cars, guns and laptops. Inmates spend months or years in 80-man dormitories with nothing to do and few educational opportunities before being released into society with $10 and a bus ticket.

Fred Schoonover, deputy warden of the 522-bed Tensas Parish Detention Center in northeast Louisiana, says he does not view inmates as a “commodity.” But he acknowledges that the prison’s business model is built on head counts. Like other wardens in this part of the state, he wheels and deals to maintain his tally of human beings. His boss, Tensas Parish Sheriff Rickey Jones, relies on him to keep the numbers up.

“We struggle. I stay on the phone a lot, calling all over the state, trying to hustle a few,” Schoonover said.

Some sheriffs, and even a few small towns, lease their prison rights to private companies. LaSalle Corrections, based in Ruston, plays a role in housing one of seven Louisiana prisoners. LCS Corrections Services, another homegrown company, runs three Louisiana prisons and is a major donor to political campaigns, including those of urban sheriffs who supply rural prisons with inmates.

 

Incarceration On The Cheap

fullpage-4reasonswhyLA-051312.jpg

 

How Louisiana became the prison capital of the world (view full size graphic)

 

 

Ask anyone who has done time in Louisiana whether he or she would rather be in a state-run prison or a local sheriff-run prison. The answer is invariably state prison.

Inmates in local prisons are typically serving sentences of 10 years or less on nonviolent charges such as drug possession, burglary or writing bad checks. State prisons are reserved for the worst of the worst.

Yet it is the murderers, rapists and other long-termers who learn trades like welding, auto mechanics, air-conditioning repair and plumbing. Angola’s Bible college offers the only chance for Louisiana inmates to earn an undergraduate degree.

Such opportunities are not available to the 53 percent serving their time in local prisons. In a cruel irony, those who could benefit most are unable to better themselves, while men who will die in prison proudly show off fistfuls of educational certificates.

Louisiana specializes in incarceration on the cheap, allocating by far the least money per inmate of any state. The $24.39 per diem is several times lower than what Angola and other state-run prisons spend — even before the sheriff takes his share. All local wardens can offer is GED classes and perhaps an inmate-led support group such as Alcoholics Anonymous. Their facilities are cramped and airless compared with the spacious grounds of state prisons, where inmates walk along outdoor breezeways and stay busy with jobs or classes.

With a criminal record, finding work is tough. In five years, about half of the state’s ex-convicts end up behind bars again.

Gregory Barber has seen the contrast between state and local prisons firsthand. He began a four-year sentence for burglary at the state-run Phelps Correctional Center — a stroke of luck for someone with a relatively short sentence on a nonviolent charge who might easily have ended up in a sheriff’s custody.

 

 

With only six months to go, the New Orleans native was transferred to Richwood Correctional Center, a LaSalle-run prison near Monroe. He had hoped to end his time in a work-release program to up his chances of getting a good job. But the 11th-hour transfer rendered him ineligible. At Phelps, he took a welding class. Now, he whiles away the hours lying in his bunk for lack of anything better to do. The only relief from the monotony is an occasional substance-abuse rehab meeting.

“In DOC camps, you’d go to the yard every day, go to work,” said Barber, 50, of state-run prisons. “Here, you just lay down, or go to meetings. It makes time pass a little slower.”

 

Downward Spiral

 

chart-louisianaworld-051312.jpg

 

While Louisiana tops the prison rankings, it consistently vies with Mississippi — the state with the second-highest incarceration rate — for the worst schools, the most poverty, the highest infant mortality. One in three Louisiana prisoners reads below a fifth-grade level. The vast majority did not complete high school. The easy fix of selling drugs or stealing is all too tempting when the alternative is a low-wage, dead-end job.

More money spent on locking up an ever-growing number of prisoners means less money for the very institutions that could help young people stay out of trouble, giving rise to a vicious cycle. Louisiana spends about $663 million a year to feed, house, secure and provide medical care to 40,000 inmates. Nearly a third of that money — $182 million — goes to for-profit prisons, whether run by sheriffs or private companies.

“Clearly, the more that Louisiana invests in large-scale incarceration, the less money is available for everything from preschools to community policing that could help to reduce the prison population,” said Marc Mauer, executive director of The Sentencing Project, a national criminal justice reform group. “You almost institutionalize the high rate of incarceration, and it’s even harder to get out of that situation.”

Louisiana’s prison epidemic disproportionately affects neighborhoods already devastated by crime and poverty. In some parts of New Orleans, a stint behind bars is a rite of passage for young men.

About 5,000 black men from New Orleans are doing state prison time, compared with 400 white men from the city. Because police concentrate resources on high-crime areas, minor lawbreakers there are more likely to be stopped and frisked or caught up in a drug sweep than, say, an Uptown college student with a sideline marijuana business.

With so many people lost to either prison or violence, fraying neighborhoods enter a downward spiral. As the incarceration rate climbs, more children grow up with fathers, brothers, grandfathers and uncles in prison, putting them at increased risk of repeating the cycle themselves.

 

‘Don’t feel no pity’

Angola is home to scores of old men who cannot get out of bed, let alone commit a crime. Someone who made a terrible mistake in his youth and has transformed himself after decades in prison has little to no chance at freedom.

 

 

Louisiana has a higher percentage of inmates serving life without parole than any other state. Its justice system is unstintingly tough on petty offenders as well as violent criminals. In more than four years in office, Jindal has only pardoned one inmate.

“Louisiana don’t feel no pity. I feel like everybody deserves a second chance,” said Preston Russell, a Lower 9th Ward native who received life without parole for a string of burglaries and a crack charge. “I feel like dudes get all this education … under their belt and been here 20, 30 years. You don’t think that’s enough time to let a man back out and give him another chance at life?”

An inmate at Angola costs the state an average of $23,000 a year. A young lifer will rack up more than $1 million in taxpayer-funded expenses if he reaches the Louisiana male life expectancy of 72.

Russell, 49, is in good health. But as he gets older, treating his age-related ailments will be expensive. The state spends about $24 million a year caring for between 300 and 400 infirm inmates.

Now in his 13th year at Angola, Russell breaks into tears recounting how he rebelled against the grandmother who raised him, leaving home as soon as he could. First he smoked weed, weed became crack, then he was selling drugs and burglarizing stores in between jobs in construction or shipping.

The last time he stole, Orleans Parish prosecutors tagged him as a multiple offender and sought the maximum — the same sentence given to murderers. In the final crime that put him away for life, he broke into Fat Harry’s and stole $4,000 from the Uptown bar’s video poker machines.

 

Political Will

Tough fiscal times have spurred many states to reduce their prison populations. In lock-’em-up Texas, new legislation is steering low-level criminals into drug treatment and other alternatives to prison.

In Louisiana, even baby steps are met with resistance. Jindal, who rose to the governor’s office with the backing of the sheriffs’ lobby, says too many people are behind bars. Yet earlier this year, he watered down a reform package hammered out by the Sentencing Commission he himself had convened. The commission includes sheriffs and district attorneys, so its proposals were modest to begin with.

Measures like those in Texas, which target a subset of nonviolent offenders, are frequently lauded but may not be enough. To make a significant dent in the prisoner numbers, sentences for violent crimes must be reduced and more money must be invested in inner-city communities, according to David Cole, a professor at Georgetown Law School. Such large-scale change — which has not been attempted in any state, let alone Louisiana — can only happen through political will.

In Louisiana, that will appears to be practically nonexistent. Locking up as many people as possible for as long as possible has enriched a few while making everyone else poorer. Public safety comes second to profits.

“You cannot build your way out of it. Very simply, you cannot build your way out of crime,” said Secretary of Corrections Jimmy LeBlanc, who supports reducing the incarceration rate and putting more resources into inmate rehabilitation. “It just doesn’t work that way. You can’t afford it. Nobody can afford that.”

New national registry details wrongful convictions

Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. – Serving clients in Orleans, Jefferson, Terrebonne, Tangipahoa, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. Tammany, St. John, Assumption and Plaquemines Parishes.

 

New national registry details

wrongful convictions

Published: Monday, May 21, 2012, 7:55 AM
By Paul Purpura, The Times-Picayune

 

 

A newly created online national list of wrongful convictions shows Louisiana has had 38 exonerations in state and federal courts since 1989. New Orleans tops the state, with at least 13 exonerations, followed by Jefferson Parish, which has had eight, according to the list announced Sunday night.

Billing itself as the most comprehensive list of its kind, the National Registry of Exonerations online database counts and profiles 891 individual cases that were overturned since 1989, the vast majority of which occurred in state courts. Its founders estimate 2,000 people have been wrongfully convicted during the past 23 years, acknowledging that the list is a work in progress.

The database was created by theUniversity of Michigan Law Schooland the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University School of Law.

“The National Registry of Exonerations gives an unprecedented view of the scope of the problem of wrongful convictions in the United States,” Rob Warden, executive director of the Center on Wrongful Convictions, said in a news release. “It’s a widespread problem.”

Louisiana hardly tops the nation in terms of numbers. According to the registry, Illinois counts 101 exonerations in state courts, followed by New York at 88, Texas at 84 and California at 79. The website is www.exonerationregistry.org.

The list’s founders recognize that there are exonerations they don’t yet know about, citing counties in California and Texas where millions of people live yet have no known cases of wrongful convictions.

“It’s clear that the exonerations we found are the tip of an iceberg,” said Michigan law professor Samuel Gross, the registry’s editor. “Most people who are falsely convicted are not exonerated. They serve their time or die in prison. And when they are exonerated, a lot of times it happens quietly, out of public view.”

For instance, the list of Jefferson Parish cases doesn’t include Michael Williams of Avondale. His attorney and prosecutors quietly vacated his second-degree murder conviction and life sentence in November.

The list does include Henry James of Westwego, whose exoneration of a 30-year-old aggravated rape conviction was heralded in a press release in October, hours after a judge vacated the conviction and prosecutors dismissed the case.

But, Williams’ and James’ cases appear to fall into typical categories of wrongful convictions. Williams was convicted of murder based on testimony of a single person, who later admitted he lied. James was convicted based on testimony of the woman who was raped – DNA has proved she was wrong.

The biggest problem in murder convictions is perjury, usually committed by someone who claims to have witnessed the crime, while in rapes, the false convictions “are almost always” based on eyewitness mistakes, according to the press release.

According to the registry, at least 135 people confessed to crimes they did not commit, while at least 129 people were convicted of crimes that never happened. The list’s founders say more than 200 drivers were framed by police for drunk driving, and that the officers “usually stole money from their wallets in the process,” according to the press release.

In some cases, the people listed are back in jail. In Jefferson Parish, Travis Hayes, whose conviction and life sentence in a Bridge City homicide were tossed out in 2007, is back in state prison for narcotics. Curtis Kyles, whose New Orleans murder conviction was reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1998, is jailed in Jefferson Parish awaiting trial on a charge of second-degree murder.

Possession, manufacture, sale or transfer of devices for avoidance of payment for telecommunications services — Louisiana

Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. – Serving clients in Orleans, Jefferson, Terrebonne, Tangipahoa, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. Tammany, St. John, Assumption and Plaquemines Parishes.

 

Possession, manufacture, sale or transfer of devices for avoidance of payment for telecommunications services or related offenses; seizure of devices — La RS 14:222

 

A.  It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to:

(1)  Make or possess any instrument, apparatus, equipment or device designed, adapted or which can be used

(a)  For commission of a crime in violation of R.S. 14:67, R.S. 14:67.3 or R.S. 14:221 or

(b)  To conceal, or to assist another to conceal, from any supplier of telecommunications services or from any lawful authority the existence or place of origin or destination of any telecommunications:

(2)  Sell, give, transport, or otherwise transfer to another, or offer or advertise to sell, give, or otherwise transfer, any instrument, apparatus, equipment, or device described in (1) above, or plans or instructions for making or assembling the same;*

under circumstances evincing an intent to use or employ such instrument, apparatus, equipment, or device, or to allow the same to be used or employed, for a purpose described in (1)(a) or (1)(b) above, or knowing or having reason to believe that the same is intended to be so used, or that the aforesaid plans or instructions are intended to be used for making or assembling such instrument, apparatus, equipment, or device.

B.  Whoever violates any provision of this Section shall, on first conviction, be fined not more than one thousand dollars, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.

On a second conviction, the offender shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

C.  Any such instrument, apparatus, equipment, device or plans or instructions therefor, may be seized by court order under a search warrant or incident to a lawful arrest; and upon the conviction of any person for a violation of any provision of this Section, or R.S. 14:67, R.S. 14:67.3 or R.S. 14:221, such instrument, apparatus, equipment, device, plans or instructions shall either be destroyed as contraband by the sheriff of the parish in which such person was convicted or turned over to the telephone company in whose territory such instrument, apparatus, equipment, device, plans or instructions were seized.

D.  The provisions of this Section shall not apply to privately owned communications equipment which is not connected with, or does not use the equipment or facilities of a telecommunications supplier regulated by a duly constituted governmental authority; nor shall the provisions of this Section apply to privately owned communications equipment which is connected with or does use the equipment or facilities of such telecommunications supplier when such connection or use is lawful and in accord with the tariffs of such supplier or is made with the consent of such supplier.

E.  Nothing herein shall apply to public service and emergency communications performed by holders of valid Federal Communications Commission radio amateur licenses without charge on the part of such licensees; provided that nothing herein shall excuse any person from compliance with lawful tariffs or any telecommunications company.

F.  Nothing herein shall apply to the sale of premises reception equipment by other than an operating cable company, so long as the equipment sold is not capable of descrambling cable signals.

G.  Nothing herein shall be construed to allow, permit, or encourage the unauthorized interception of cable services.

Avoiding payment for phone services, cable television services, or multipoint distribution system service — Louisiana

Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans

 

Elizabeth B. Carpenter, Esq. – Serving clients in Orleans, Jefferson, Terrebonne, Tangipahoa, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. Tammany, St. John, Assumption and Plaquemines Parishes.

 

Avoiding payment for phone services, cable television services, or multipoint distribution system service — Louisiana 14:221

A.  Avoidance of payment for telecommunication, cable television, or multipoint distribution system services is the avoidance, attempt to avoid, or the causing of another person to avoid, the lawful charges, in whole or in part, for any telephone, telegraph, cable, or multipoint distribution system service utilized or for the transmission of a message, signal, or other communication over telephone, telegraph, cable facilities, or multipoint distribution system:

(1)  By the use of a code, prearranged scheme, or other similar strategem or device whereby such person, in effect, sends or receives information; or

(2)  By rearranging, tampering or interfering with, or making unauthorized connection with any facilities or equipment of a telephone or telegraph company, whether physically, inductively, acoustically, or otherwise; or

(3)  By intercepting and decoding a transmission by a multipoint distribution system without the authorization of the provider of the service, the person intentionally or knowingly attaches to, causes to be attached to, or incorporates in a television set, video tape recorder, or other equipment designed to receive a television transmission a device that intercepts and decodes the transmission.

(4)  By the use of any other fraudulent means, method, trick, or device.

B.(1)  On a first conviction, the offender shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.

(2)  On a second conviction, the offender shall be fined not more than five thousand dollars, or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than five years, or both.

C.  Nothing herein shall prohibit the use of earth station receivers to receive satellite communications.